UDLCO summary : The inquiry into dimensionality in learning adaptations acknowledges that most academic learning has currently evolved into a process of objectively structuring subjective complex multidimensional real life data (blooms level 3-5) into a two dimensional space (blooms level 1 aka knowledge) that can be stored forwarded asynchronously and modeled conceptually to gain understanding (blooms level 2) through further analysis ( level 4) and evaluation (level 5) and then relooped into the learning ecosystem as creative communication/publication (level 6). This learning is cyclic and one can keep moving in and out of these levels at any entry or exit point regardless of level numbers.
UDLC transcripts:
[12/11, 8:35 AM] Rakesh Biswas: A renunciate explains to PM why the prime driver for optimal collective cognition for national development is education toward a sustainable ecological balance of attitude, ethics, communication, aka AETCOM and not let the youth fall prey to material pleasure driven vyabhichara
[12/11, 8:37 AM] Prof S : With " vyavichar" all around, ......such lecturing has any value???🤷🏻♀️
[12/11, 8:39 AM] Rakesh Biswas: Once it comes as an NMC circular it will
[12/11, 8:40 AM] Prof S Physiology : Well, let me be hopeful
[12/11, 8:47 AM] Prof S Physiology : Looks really good on-papers….
[12/11, 9:09 AM] Rakesh Biswas: And in video as in the above?
[12/11, 9:13 AM] Prof SaKlesh Peds : Even better
[12/11, 9:55 AM] Rakesh Biswas: Thanks for the profound inputs that acted as a cognitive stimulant.
Yes it's a dimensionality issue! When we say it looks good on paper we could mean current academic learning that is predominantly in two dimensional spaces that can often appear unreal to those who don't live inside their device screens!
In fact most academic learning has currently evolved into a process of objectively structuring subjective complex multidimensional real life data (blooms level 3-5) into a two dimensional space (blooms level 1 aka knowledge) that can be stored forwarded asynchronously and modeled conceptually to gain understanding (blooms level 2) through further analysis ( level 4) and evaluation (level 5) and then relooped into the learning ecosystem as creative communication/publication (level 6). This learning is cyclic and one can keep moving in and out of these levels at any entry or exit point regardless of level numbers.
Is it possible to learn directly from 3 dimensional lived life experiences doing away with the 2 dimensional modeling altogether?
Perhaps humans would need something like a biologically implanted multimodal AI tool in their BNNs to achieve that? @Dr Avneesh Khare 🇮🇳
More about our ongoing tryst to osce clinical dimensionality here👇
[12/12, 9:18 AM] Metapsychist Number 1 Kims 2015: Creating an ontology difference when there's none.
Labelling and sorting.
It's there now too,in different context.
Castes became religions and nations..
Only solution for this is intergalactic interdimensional travel/posthumanism.
Gotta involve aliens into the equation
[12/12, 9:20 AM] Rakesh Biswas: No ontologic difference between god, humans and AI...liens
[12/12, 9:23 AM] Rakesh Biswas: Again spurred my recent thoughts on dimensionality.
While I have become recently convinced how we academics are essentially engaged in converting three dimensional multimodal reality into manageable two dimensions, I was pondering about what would it be like to live in a unidimensional world of singularity?
Have postponed my google searching on it for now but if anyone here is interested in collaborating on the paper below then could help by sharing more about dimensionality to begin with :
[12/12, 9:22 AM] Metapsychist Number 1 Kims 2015: Politics between god and deities/aliens too!
[12/12, 9:25 AM] Rakesh Biswas: Aka anava mala that gives us our sense of separation as an object rather than being a subject and that also creates this constant sense of something that is lacking
[12/12, 9:31 AM] Metapsychist Number 1 Kims 2015: Exploring the concept of a unidimensional world is intriguing. In such a reality, complexity and diversity might be drastically reduced, potentially leading to a simpler existence.(Which is good too-Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication) However, it raises questions about perception, experience, and the nature of existence itself.
[12/12, 9:32 AM] Metapsychist Number 1 Kims 2015: 'Selfish gene' as mentioned by Richard dawkins,keeps the duality game going forever
[12/12, 9:33 AM] Rakesh Biswas: Also think how would life be in the x axis without the y axis?
Would it be like a singular point or bindu that is essentially a cross-section of the x or y axis?
[12/12, 9:34 AM] Rakesh Biswas: The two dimensional world that we academics love to create and where a large population hooked to their mobile screens also reside is also known as flat land
[12/12, 9:35 AM] Metapsychist Number 1 Kims 2015: Less variables in 2d mobile world compared to 3d outer world.
No variables in singularity
[12/12, 9:38 AM] Rakesh Biswas: How would it be like to reside in a world with no variables?
First chapter of conscious notebook?
Topic for eschatology?
Real world revisitation of dimensionality :
